kaskul

Imagination of ibnu Arabi and Shadra

It is not so easy to summarize the thought of ibnu arabi in some papers, it will need repetitive writing and deep analyses through all of his main treatises. Ibnu Arabi did’n write in systematic way, although with propound content it still using paradoxical statement and ambiguity conception. One who like to know more about his doctrine will lead to confius?? Stuck on his position as intuitive journeys is different path and have his unique own characteristic.

It is good relation between ontology and epistemology. It seems that ontology should to learn first and be a fix principle just it we never ascertain about his existence how a individual try to discovering it. Starting by believing in existence later on a one eagerly to know it. Concerning to existence there are some of discussion of a term…

Is existence (wujud) can be defined? Or not and it is lead some question as such is there something more general than wujud (existence) since definition consider a genus (jins) and fashl (differenciated). Therefore there is no more obviously than wujud (existence) itself.

So, it is very clear when Sabzawari said that wujud is self-evident, in transparent manner but in sometimes have a hidden reality which is difficult to observed.

And any one even a child may know otomatically it is innate but to discover its reality is need deep contemplation.

So it is a task of philosopher to examinize of wujud and to take in to consideration of element and aspect of wujud

Mulla Sadra suggests that this character is almost one of the priori data (al-awwaliyyat). A proof of it is: 1) we divide existence into its different categories, such as the existence of the Necessary Being and the existence of the Contingent Being. The validity of a division depends on the unity of what is being divided. 2) Another proof is that non-existence (‘Adam) is the contradictory of existence. Non-existence is univocal, because there are no distinctions in non-existence. Hence, existence which is the contradictory of non-existence is also univocal. Or else, it would violate the law of contradiction.

Ethic of Kant

Frans Budihardiman said anyone who like to learn know ethic of modern west philosopher should

i t is a creatifity and geniusityof ibnu turkah who help to make clear and in such way so any one who have intention to read fushusul hikam shoul read primarily his book. ibnu turkaf define wahdah as basithah and basithah kulla asya which onenes is encompasing all of everthing. but not one of them. so wujud is present in everthing  but  not  everthing itself . not part of it.

minggu-minggu ini dan bahkan mungkinberbullan-bulan dan mungkin selama hidup manusia bisa menjadi budak iblis. ia hanya mencari pemenuhan kesenangan-kesenangan fisik dan bukan menahan diri dan melatih menghentikan segala kebiasaannya. ini adalah sebuah kesengajaan dan fisik selalu menuntut pemenuhan dengan segala konsekuensinya.