Imagination of ibnu Arabi and Shadra
It is not so easy to summarize the thought of ibnu arabi in some papers, it will need repetitive writing and deep analyses through all of his main treatises. Ibnu Arabi did’n write in systematic way, although with propound content it still using paradoxical statement and ambiguity conception. One who like to know more about his doctrine will lead to confius?? Stuck on his position as intuitive journeys is different path and have his unique own characteristic.
It is good relation between ontology and epistemology. It seems that ontology should to learn first and be a fix principle just it we never ascertain about his existence how a individual try to discovering it. Starting by believing in existence later on a one eagerly to know it. Concerning to existence there are some of discussion of a term…
Is existence (wujud) can be defined? Or not and it is lead some question as such is there something more general than wujud (existence) since definition consider a genus (jins) and fashl (differenciated). Therefore there is no more obviously than wujud (existence) itself.
So, it is very clear when Sabzawari said that wujud is self-evident, in transparent manner but in sometimes have a hidden reality which is difficult to observed.
And any one even a child may know otomatically it is innate but to discover its reality is need deep contemplation.
